A six-row comparison table is enough for most small decisions, provided every row has a source and a date.
When you hesitate between two areas, the danger is not picking the worse one, but picking on a single impression: “this area is lively”. A good comparison puts both areas in the same table, with the same criteria, on the same date.
The six rows
1) Population and growth within the radius (official source and date). 2) Number of similar businesses within the radius and the spread of their ratings. 3) Review share of the top three competitors, as a visibility indicator. 4) Recurring complaints in the area’s reviews. 5) Published rental listings for similar units, with the collection date. 6) Access and parking across three visits.
A restaurant is not a pharmacy
For a restaurant, the competition and review rows carry more weight, because the customer chooses. For a pharmacy, the population and access rows weigh more, because the customer needs. So do not use the same weights for both activities, and set the weights before you see the numbers, not after.
What the table does not settle
The table ranks the two areas, but it does not guarantee success in either. Its honest output is not “Area A is best”, but “Area A leads on four of six criteria, and these are the assumptions that must hold”.
A location decision is not settled by an impression, nor by a guarantee. It is settled by a table with sources and dates.
Want this table for your own two areas?
Compare my sites